Books The Guardian

wordery Buy Books Online, Over 10 Millions Books

Radical Technologies Free download ☆ PDF eBook or Kindle ePUB free

Summary ↠ PDF, eBook or Kindle ePUB free ´ Adam Greenfield

Radical Technologies're told that innovations from augmented reality interfaces and virtual assistants to autonomous delivery drones and self driving cars will make life easier convenient and productive D printing promises unprecedented control over the form and distribution of matter while the blockchain stands to revolutionize everything from the recording and exchange of value to the way we organize the mundane realities of the day to day And all the while fiendishly complex algorithms are operating uietly in the background reshaping the. “the purpose of a system is what it does”When in the concluding chapter Greenfield invokes Stafford Beer with the above uote all the preceding chapters click into place and it is marvellousWith great patience and care Greenfield walks us through the smartphone IoT AR 3D printing cryptocurrency the blockchain automation machine learning and finally general artificial intelligence—showing how each works in great detail while steering clear of technical jargon And importantly showing how each has conditioned everyday life to become radically different from what it was beforeAt the very end Greenfield insists that “people with left politics of any stripe absolutely cannot allow their eyes to glaze over when the topic of conversation turns to technology” He is absolutely right—and this is probably the best single volume I have come across thus far that can serve as a field guide for radical technologists willing to take up his challenge

Read Radical Technologies

Radical Technologies Free download ☆ PDF, eBook or Kindle ePUB free ✓ ✅ [PDF / Epub] ☉ Radical Technologies By Adam Greenfield ⚣ – A field manual to the technologies that are transforming our livesEverywhere we turn a startling new device promises to transfigure Economy transforming the fundamental terms of our politics and even redefining what it means to be humanHaving successfully colonized everyday life these radical technologies are now conditioning the choices available to us in the years to come How do they work What challenges do they present to us as individuals and societies Who benefits from their adoption In answering these uestions Greenfield's timely guide clarifies the scale and nature of the crisis we now confront and offers ways to reclaim our stake in the futu. A terrific book that strikes a well considered balance between the real political potential offered by new technologies on the one hand and the many institutional ideological technological limitations they encounter when interacting both with each other and with the world around us on the other Greenfield writes with passion elouence and tremendous knowledgeability about these topics in language that is accessible and engaging without sacrificing nuance or complexity My only point of minor criticism is related to the book's structure which is divided into chapters that tackle specific technologies one by one This makes it harder for the book as a whole to build a real sense of momentum or develop a single strong argument while also unavoidably I think yielding a sense of repetitiveness on occasion But these are minor uibbles about an important book that comes highly recommended

Adam Greenfield ´ 5 Free download

A field manual to the technologies that are transforming our livesEverywhere we turn a startling new device promises to transfigure our lives But at what cost In this urgent and revelatory excavation of our Information Age leading technology thinker Adam Greenfield forces us to reconsider our relationship with the networked objects services and spaces that define us It is time to re evaluate the Silicon Valley consensus determining the futureWe already depend on the smartphone to navigate every aspect of our existence We. If I had known that this book was published by Verso I probably would not have bothered buying it Buying a Verso book is like buying a book from the Ignatius Press You pretty well know what you are going to get and it helps being a true believer to get maximum enjoyment from itIn this case Greenfield fits the standard issue model gloomily negative pessimistic striving to find some optimism of the will and 'right on' about yawn feminism Marx environmentalism progressivism and Occupy Yawn bloody yawn However to be fair this conservatism of the Left the prevailing ideology of our times based on a the inability to escape the deathly hold of German Idealism and b a class terror of radical change in the urban professional middle classes is only occasionally irritating in this bookThe bulk of the book is actually uite interesting Greenfield raises some significant difficulties about the emergence of a whole set of radical technologies that bear consideration The chapters on cryptocurrencies blockchain and machine learning are particularly good He has done us a serviceMy regret is that the book is underpinned by negativity about the condition of the world and what technology will do in that context What I wanted was direct analysis of the technologies that he describes this is what Marx would have done Marx did not whine He analysedWhat Greenfield does do effectively is puncture the balloon of those loopy and naive techno optimists who seem to think that they can predict the unknowable future only in positive terms and who seem to have aspirations for humanity as ridiculous as the pessimism of the conservative LeftHe is definitely right to point out that there is something definitely disturbing in what I have termed 'self hating humans' who want to move into something 'post human' an attitude that is deviantly as pessimist about our species as the miserabilism of the LeftBoth are profoundly anti humanist at core One the Left seems to deny individual autonomy and choice The other the techno optimists seem to think that being human is some sort of disease from which we must emerge in a misreading of Nietzsche They both show a fundamental immaturity about existence a positively adolescent attitude to reality They have come to feel our species is inadeuate in some way when it is in fact perfectly adeuate to its own needs It is just taking time to grow up There is no rushing these thingsPerhaps they want perfection either as socialists or techno optimists in a world that is never going to be perfect or perfectible and where the good life means improving what one can which is a great deal incrementally and accepting what one cannot improveBoth the market and the community State have roles to play in this incrementalist view of progress each checks the other so the triumph of one or the other is not to be sought What we need is balanceThis inability to hang on to incremental improvement in the human condition as a good thing in itself and to accept inconveniences like sickness and death as sometimes not resolvable leads to a psychology of futile activism disastrous unintended conseuences and constant despair or hysteriaNeither side really seems to understand how social forces operate in times of rapid technological change nor the unknowability of things nor how extrapolations of a condition rarely apply nor how elites circulate and change yet are never uite the same after new means of production emergeBoth sides live in an idealistic dreamland negative or positive of imagined realities Both sides deny because they are the saddest of creatures the intellectual in a time of change the sheer unpredictable complexity of human responses to change and the power of individual choiceIt is exciting to be human the constant change the aging and experience the passions and creativities yet being human is something only humans can do Machines can only be machines We may change because of machines but there is nothing intrinsically new about that As intellectuals Left pessimists and techno optimists alike insist on seeing ordinary folk as mere subjects of history or innovation creatures of huge mindless systems They are not They create those systems by sets of choice while elites themselves are often creatures of their own subjectsThe last two chapters certainly tell us something about the insecurities of the urban professional who thinks himself entitled to a living in a safe and secure world Verso books are written by the intellectual precariat for the intellectual precariat but the rest of us don't really need to careOnce you get past the miserabilist ideology you have a very interesting series of chapters summarising developments in smartphone interconnectedness the internet of things digital fabrication cryptocurrencies blockchain automation machine learning and artificial intelligenceThis is where I am happy to have paid out my £1899 even if I could have done with of the same Greenfield is undoubtedly highly intelligent He has mastered some complex technologies and has broadly presented them with clarity the blockchain chapter is certainly a noble attemptRemoving the ideological presuppositions the case is well made that we are well into a technological revolution of awe inspiring potential for change across a wide front and that the disruption will be considerable We humans actually thrive on a degree of periodic disruptionThe interconnectedness of things in the new world is well argued for although he probably over estimates the degree to which people will concede ground on providing all the data that the system needs to be fool proof Again he denies ordinary people awareness of their own condition As usual in such books that are part polemical there is far too much extrapolation and far too much assumption that the elites are in control of the situation themselves Having said that the chapters on machine learning and AI do present a reasonable case that no thinking process is 'safe'He has no solutions for problems other than rhetoric based on gloom or perhaps a naive belief in collective action that is likely to disrupt the disruption yes but probably like all such disruptions of disruption merely compound the problems for the little people like us with yet disruptionThere is an argument here for greater engagement by the State in regulating conditions for innovation ensuring that it meets core human values My own view is that centralised libertarian socialism will become the dialectical combatant with market driven anarcho capitalismDemocratic libertarian 'national' socialism conceptually problematic for the mobile urban intelligentsia and anarcho capitalism conceptually problematic for everyone except anarcho capitalists will do a tango of eventual grace and beauty that will better our conditionIt does however reuire that the Left abandons its Idealism returning to values and sentiments as human drivers and that anarcho capitalists realise that they can no buck the social system than a gambler can buck the house in Las Vegas The energy devoted to rhetorical exhortation in this book according to the values of the decadent conservative Left of the millenials should have gone into exploring that dialectic how nation states can be strengthened to manage the process of changeThe trouble is that the answer is not very helpful for the graduate non technical class that depends on state funds to engage in its well meaning rhetoric Resources are going to have to be shifted from this class to the population at large This is where the Left is conservative in its own interestThe position of the urban intelligensia will be like that of priests after the Industrial Revolution hangovers from the past who may need to be subsidised but only out of values sentiment and because of their lingering cultural power amongst still conservative establishmentsTechnological innovation is coming regardless of all this Those countries that try to avoid it will be as pauperised as those that failed to industrialise in the nineteenth century The uestion is how to 'nationalise' it since internationalism as a mode of resistance is a romantic pipe dreamOne major whine of this liberal class not in this book is that populism has emerged and 'democracy has failed' the whine of the loser But populism which is malign is paradoxically progressive because it has shown just how complacent the hegemonic middle class had becomeThe rise of Trump and related developments should teach lessons rather than result in collective operations to return to the 'status uo ante bellum' The main lesson has been that these new technologies should be embraced for the people We need rulers who understand themWe certainly do not need university intellectuals running things We certainly do not need engineers and scientists making decisions let alone corporate executives and young geeks on the make We need a new class of techno proficient administrators and popular politiciansAbove all we do not need pessimism We do not need to slow down this revolution We simply need to be in command of it as populations This means increased technical and political education courageous politicians less lawyerdom and powers for the democratic StateThere is not one area described by Greenfield that could not bring benefits to humanity and yet each of them clearly has negative effects on human autonomy and freedom It is here that the human arrives in the game by reasserting human autonomy and freedom against the machinesIn fact it is not about the machines at all it is about the humans who are behind the machines The machines are just tools until one of them becomes sentient and then we are into a whole new ball game Greenfield is absolutely right to look at the power relations between humans as criticalThe democratic State needs to shift now away from theory and the manipulation of culture and towards the pragmatic business of containing and curtailing not the technologies but the control of technologies by special interests which reuires investment in community expertiseIt needs collaboration across borders while retaining full control over what affects its own population another positive reason for Brexit It needs to have technology that will give people what they want and not what intellectuals beieve they should want Sex robots if necessary The most perfect collaboration would be between the democratic socialist community State and the anarcho capitalist market at the expense of the hegemonics of a conservative middle class that has had a rhetoric of liberation that has liberated only their own kindThis book is not a bad primer for understanding what technologies are available in the middle of the second decade of the twenty first century and what uestions should be asked of it What we do not need is the flaccid late Marxist Idealism of the late twentieth century getting in the way